Re: preempt-timing-2.6.8-rc1

William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-13T13:19:50Z

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> The semantics I implemented are warning for strictly above the
>> preempt_thresh. Whether those semantics are ideal is irrelevant; it's
>> faithful to those semantics.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:10:09PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> You are right - I misread it, sorry.

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Given that people are asking for sub-
>> millisecond latencies, maybe I should increase the precision.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:10:09PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Would soon be useful I think.

Let me spin up the CONFIG_PREEMPT=n fix and then I'll move on that.

-- wli