Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc3-O5

Ingo Molnar
2004-08-12T07:25:02Z

* Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:

> There is definitely some subtle bug in the preempt-timing patch,
> because I am getting reports of long non-preemptible sections, which
> do not correspond to an xrun in jackd - if these were real then even a
> 400usec non-preemptible section would cause an xrun. I do not seem to
> get many xruns during normal jackd operation.

could you send me these latest preempt-timing warnings?

Ingo