From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265981AbUHIPwV (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:52:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266126AbUHIPwV (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:52:21 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:34761 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266701AbUHIPro (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:47:44 -0400 Subject: Re: FW: Linux kernel file offset pointer races From: Alan Cox To: Frank Steiner Cc: Jirka Kosina , Giuliano Pochini , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <411736CB.2040607@bio.ifi.lmu.de> References: <411736CB.2040607@bio.ifi.lmu.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1092062710.14129.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:45:12 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Llu, 2004-08-09 at 09:33, Frank Steiner wrote: > So this is for 2.4. What about 2.6? Distributors like RedHat have patched > their 2.6.7 kernel accordingly, but I haven't found anything similar in > the kernel tree from kernel.org. Do you know if there is any a fix for > the 2.6 tree, too? If you want a fix now grab the Red Hat or SuSE published fixes. The final stuff will probably look very different because Linus has proposed a different solution that makes it harder for new drivers to make the same mistakes again