From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Eric Lammerts <eric@lammerts.org>
Cc: Marc Ballarin <Ballarin.Marc@gmx.de>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
albert@users.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dynamic /dev security hole?
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:54:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092074088.14568.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408091238080.8693@vivaldi.madbase.net>
On Llu, 2004-08-09 at 17:47, Eric Lammerts wrote:
> > I have linked copy (not open)
> > Device unloaded
>
> At this point, udev (with the chown/chmod patch) would chown your
> linked copy (before unlinking the original device node), right?
Providing it does so its safe I think yes
Well apart from stupid things like udev on shared NFS filestore, but
anyone doing that probably deserves it..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-09 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-08 12:47 dynamic /dev security hole? Albert Cahalan
2004-08-08 15:58 ` Marc Ballarin
2004-08-08 15:04 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-08 20:42 ` Greg KH
2004-08-08 16:21 ` Greg KH
2004-08-08 21:43 ` Marc Ballarin
2004-08-08 22:07 ` Marc Ballarin
2004-08-09 4:40 ` Eric Lammerts
2004-08-09 13:30 ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-09 13:19 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-09 16:54 ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-09 17:04 ` Eric Lammerts
2004-08-09 17:14 ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-10 0:21 ` Greg KH
2004-08-11 17:12 ` [RFC, PATCH] sys_revoke(), just a try. (was: Re: dynamic /dev security hole?) Michael Buesch
2004-08-12 16:49 ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-12 19:51 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-12 19:39 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-13 12:39 ` Michael Buesch
2004-08-09 14:49 ` dynamic /dev security hole? Alan Cox
2004-08-09 16:17 ` Eric Lammerts
2004-08-09 15:33 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-09 16:47 ` Eric Lammerts
2004-08-09 17:54 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-08-10 0:21 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1092074088.14568.0.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=Ballarin.Marc@gmx.de \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eric@lammerts.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox