From: Robert Love <rml@ximian.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kernel events layer
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:47:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092080828.25658.19.camel@betsy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040809132907.GA1792@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 15:29 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Funny... you want to create new namespace and argue "no policy".
The idea was to create the simplest namespace possible (simply using the
source path names) since we need _something_ to send to user-space.
However ...
> If you want to translate it to something URI-like, you should
> do that in userspace.
It is no longer an issue, because the current plan is to tie the events
to kobjects.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-09 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-23 17:41 [patch] kernel events layer Robert Love
2004-07-23 18:25 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-23 18:31 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2004-07-23 18:35 ` Robert Love
2004-07-23 21:32 ` Dan Aloni
2004-07-24 2:47 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 4:42 ` Keith Owens
2004-07-24 5:00 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 8:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24 5:37 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 6:02 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 9:43 ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-07-24 20:21 ` James Morris
2004-07-25 2:12 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 6:53 ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-24 11:37 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2004-07-24 3:02 ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24 3:14 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 9:15 ` Michael Clark
2004-07-24 15:08 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 15:45 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 17:33 ` Ryan Anderson
2004-07-24 17:46 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-24 18:19 ` Robert Love
2004-07-25 18:11 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-25 19:08 ` Robert Love
2004-07-27 5:09 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-07-24 17:54 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 18:13 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 20:08 ` Rutger Nijlunsing
2004-07-26 20:10 ` Robert Love
2004-08-09 13:29 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-09 19:47 ` Robert Love [this message]
2004-07-24 3:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-24 2:14 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 5:15 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24 5:41 ` Robert Love
2004-07-24 5:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-24 3:11 ` [patch] kernel events layer, updated Robert Love
2004-07-24 7:58 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-07-24 8:23 ` Deepak Saxena
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-26 6:04 [patch] kernel events layer Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26 6:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 23:00 ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-26 7:31 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-26 14:50 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 16:12 ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 18:13 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-26 18:15 ` Robert Love
2004-07-26 19:03 ` Greg KH
2004-07-26 20:44 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-27 18:15 ` Mike Waychison
2004-07-27 18:35 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-07-27 18:37 ` Tim Hockin
2004-07-26 22:58 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-07-27 7:08 ` Deepak Saxena
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1092080828.25658.19.camel@betsy \
--to=rml@ximian.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@metaparadigm.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox