From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Nathan Bryant <nbryant@optonline.net>,
Linux SCSI Reflector <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI midlayer power management
Date: 12 Aug 2004 16:31:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092342716.2184.56.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040812202622.GD14556@elf.ucw.cz>
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 16:26, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Yes.
Well, that makes the suspend and resume functions rather complex.
They're not going to be coded simply if we have to save and restore the
register state of the cards and reinitialise them. I assume if you had
to pick three drivers to do this for, that would be aic7xxx, aic79xx and
sym_2?
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-12 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-10 23:58 [PATCH] SCSI midlayer power management Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 8:09 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-11 13:13 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 13:37 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-11 15:21 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-11 16:28 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-11 16:43 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 23:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 7:45 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 10:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 12:48 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 13:14 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 16:29 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 19:11 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 19:34 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 20:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 20:31 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-08-12 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 20:42 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-12 20:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 20:52 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 20:40 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 23:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 22:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-12 22:43 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-12 23:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-12 13:41 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 16:45 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-08-12 23:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-11 20:19 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-11 20:50 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 22:16 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-11 22:48 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-12 7:43 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-12 9:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-12 13:43 ` Nathan Bryant
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-16 13:29 James.Smart
2004-08-10 23:56 Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 9:53 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-11 12:55 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-08-11 13:39 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1092342716.2184.56.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbryant@optonline.net \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox