From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S267578AbUHPMRU@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S267578AbUHPMRU (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:17:20 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267575AbUHPMRU
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:17:20 -0400
Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:53731 "EHLO
	localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S267578AbUHPMQr (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:16:47 -0400
Subject: Re: DRM and 2.4 ...
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: arjanv@redhat.com
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
       DRI Devel <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1092640312.2791.6.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408160652350.9944@skynet>
	 <1092640312.2791.6.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1092654860.20517.22.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) 
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:14:21 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Llu, 2004-08-16 at 08:11, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> I would strongly urge you to no longer update DRM in 2.4 in significant
> ways. 2.4 is the release for doing strict maintenance; people who want
> to run newer X will generally run 2.6 kernels as well anyway.

Then 2.4 users can't use the new Xorg release fully. That would be
rather out of keeping with X policy.