From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268045AbUHQAIC (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:08:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268033AbUHQAGr (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:06:47 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:3978 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S268050AbUHQAGK (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:06:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P1 From: Lee Revell To: Florian Schmidt Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Felipe Alfaro Solana In-Reply-To: <20040817021431.169d07db@mango.fruits.de> References: <20040815115649.GA26259@elte.hu> <20040816022554.16c3c84a@mango.fruits.de> <1092622121.867.109.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040816023655.GA8746@elte.hu> <1092624221.867.118.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040816032806.GA11750@elte.hu> <20040816033623.GA12157@elte.hu> <1092627691.867.150.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040816034618.GA13063@elte.hu> <1092628493.810.3.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040816040515.GA13665@elte.hu> <20040817021431.169d07db@mango.fruits.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1092701223.13981.106.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:07:04 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 20:14, Florian Schmidt wrote: > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:05:15 +0200 > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Lee Revell wrote: > > > > > Anyway, the change to sched.c fixes the mlockall bug, it works > > > perfectly now. Thanks! > > > > great! This fix also means that we've got one more lock-break in the > > ext3 journalling code and one more lock-break in dcache.c. I've > > released-P1 with the fix included: > > > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/voluntary-preempt/voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P1 > > Hi, > > i don't know if this was mentioned before, but i sometimes see traces > like this where half the entries are "preempt_schedule > (copy_page_range)". I just wanted to ask if this is normal and expected > behaviour. > Yes, Ingo identified an issue with copy_page_range, I don't think it's fixed yet. See the voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0 thread. Lee