From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268503AbUHTRsE (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:48:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268592AbUHTRsE (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:48:04 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.105]:39621 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268503AbUHTRsB (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:48:01 -0400 Subject: Re: ketchup versus patch-kernel From: Dave Hansen To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , Matt Mackall , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20040820193835.GB7298@mars.ravnborg.org> References: <1093021608.15662.1228.camel@nighthawk> <20040820193835.GB7298@mars.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1093024052.15662.1245.camel@nighthawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:47:32 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 12:38, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 10:06:48AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > Since 2.6.8.1 came out, I'm sure a lot of automated tools stopped > > working, ketchup included. > > Can someone please explain to me what is the difference between > patch-kernel and ketchup? In my view, there's no basic difference in their intention: turn one kernel version into another. Although, ketchup does handle a few more things like downloads, gpg, and a wider variety of trees like -mm, -mjb and -tiny. -- Dave