From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S268696AbUHTUIJ@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S268696AbUHTUIJ (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:08:09 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268692AbUHTUIJ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:08:09 -0400
Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:17296 "HELO
	mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S268706AbUHTUG0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:06:26 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P5
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Thomas Charbonnel <thomas@undata.org>,
       Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>,
       Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>,
       Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com
In-Reply-To: <41264506.1090302@cybsft.com>
References: <1092627691.867.150.camel@krustophenia.net>
	 <20040816034618.GA13063@elte.hu> <1092628493.810.3.camel@krustophenia.net>
	 <20040816040515.GA13665@elte.hu> <1092654819.5057.18.camel@localhost>
	 <20040816113131.GA30527@elte.hu> <20040816120933.GA4211@elte.hu>
	 <1092716644.876.1.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040817080512.GA1649@elte.hu>
	 <20040819073247.GA1798@elte.hu> <20040820133031.GA13105@elte.hu>
	 <41264506.1090302@cybsft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1093032387.10063.136.camel@krustophenia.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:06:27 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 14:37, K.R. Foley wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>  > i've uploaded the -P5 patch:
>  >
>  >   http://redhat.com/~mingo/voluntary-preempt/voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P5
>  >
> 
> Here is a latency trace generated by the NFS compile in the
> stress-kernel. It is ~1.7 ms which doesn't really surprise me for the
> NFS compile. I am going to take the NFS compile out of the test now and
> see what else falls out.
> 
> If it would be useful for me to provide additional information with
> this, please let me know.
> 
> http://www.cybsft.com/testresults/2.6.8.1-P5/latency_trace1.txt
> 

Ugh, XDR rears its ugly head...

Lee