From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267786AbUHXAmW (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:42:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267792AbUHXAkt (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:40:49 -0400 Received: from fmr99.intel.com ([192.55.52.32]:51622 "EHLO hermes-pilot.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267514AbUHWTpH (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:45:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] Bus Resource Management From: Len Brown To: Adam Belay Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, rml@ximian.com, mochel@digitalimplant.org In-Reply-To: <20040819133550.GH3824@neo.rr.com> References: <20040819133550.GH3824@neo.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1093289962.17215.45.camel@dhcppc4> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 23 Aug 2004 15:39:22 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 09:35, Adam Belay wrote: > 2.) Sysfs user interface > - userspace applications can determine resource usage and > dependencies. > - userspace applications can disable and enable devices > - userspace applications can assign resources to a device > - userspace applications can pause the operation of a device, and > rebalance > its resources I agree that run-time hotplug policy and re-balancing would all be very snappy from user-space - users should be in charge when setting policy. Heck, humans may even be needed to make some decisions regarding resource conflicts... But I'm wondering where the proper line is between that and the resource management that we have to do on boot before user-space exists. cheers, -Len