public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin Schlemmer [c]" <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][7/7] add xattr support to ramfs [u]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:27:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093296463.7561.0.camel@nosferatu.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040823205942.GA3370@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 977 bytes --]

On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 22:59, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:26:29PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 16:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 02:22:20PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> > > > This patch adds xattr support to tmpfs, and a security xattr handler.
> > > > Original patch from: Chris PeBenito <pebenito@gentoo.org>
> > > 
> > > What's the point on doing this for ramfs?  And if you really want this
> > > the implementation could be shared with tmpfs easily and put into xattr.c
> > 
> > For udev.
> 
> What's wrong with using a tmpfs for udev in such situations that xattrs
> are needed?  udev does not require ramfs at all.  In fact, why not just
> use a ext2 or ext3 partition for /dev instead today, if you really need
> it?
> 

Root-less boxes comes to mind ...  Wont comment on if tmpfs/ramfs
should be used though - that you guys can sort out =)


Thanks,

-- 
Martin Schlemmer

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-23 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-23 18:14 [PATCH][0/7] xattr consolidation and support for ramfs & tmpfs James Morris
2004-08-23 18:15 ` [PATCH][1/7] xattr consolidation - libfs James Morris
2004-08-23 18:16   ` [PATCH][2/7] xattr consolidation - LSM hook changes James Morris
2004-08-23 18:17     ` [PATCH][3/7] xattr consolidation - ext3 James Morris
2004-08-23 18:18       ` [PATCH][4/7] xattr consolidation - ext2 James Morris
2004-08-23 18:19         ` [5/7] xattr consolidation - devpts James Morris
2004-08-23 18:20           ` [PATCH][6/7] add xattr support to tmpfs James Morris
2004-08-23 18:22             ` [PATCH][7/7] add xattr support to ramfs James Morris
2004-08-23 20:26               ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-23 20:26                 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-23 20:46                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-23 20:59                   ` Greg KH
2004-08-23 21:27                     ` Martin Schlemmer [c] [this message]
2004-08-24  0:52                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-08-24 11:27                     ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-25  7:03                       ` Miles Bader
2004-08-25 13:14                         ` James Morris
2004-08-23 19:06             ` [PATCH][6/7] add xattr support to tmpfs Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-23 19:03     ` [PATCH][2/7] xattr consolidation - LSM hook changes Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-23 19:06       ` James Morris
2004-08-23 19:13       ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-24  0:54         ` James Morris
2004-08-24  2:52           ` viro
2004-08-24 19:27             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-08-23 23:28       ` Andreas Dilger
2004-08-23 18:49   ` [PATCH][1/7] xattr consolidation - libfs Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-24  4:32     ` James Morris
2004-08-24 10:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-24 19:42         ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-08-24 20:19           ` James Morris
2004-08-24 19:41 ` [PATCH][0/7] xattr consolidation and support for ramfs & tmpfs Andreas Gruenbacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1093296463.7561.0.camel@nosferatu.lan \
    --to=azarah@nosferatu.za.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox