From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Cc: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.8.1-mm3
Date: 24 Aug 2004 23:50:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093405836.2206.447.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040821214733.GE9660@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
On Sat, 2004-08-21 at 17:47, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I prefer the former, something like
>
> int scsi_test_unit_ready(struct scsi_device *sdev);
OK, how about the attached. It seems to work for me, but then I don't
have any of the problem devices ...
James
===== drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c 1.29 vs edited =====
--- 1.29/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c 2004-08-19 16:11:54 -05:00
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_ioctl.c 2004-08-24 22:34:39 -05:00
@@ -432,12 +432,8 @@
case SCSI_IOCTL_DOORUNLOCK:
return scsi_set_medium_removal(sdev, SCSI_REMOVAL_ALLOW);
case SCSI_IOCTL_TEST_UNIT_READY:
- scsi_cmd[0] = TEST_UNIT_READY;
- scsi_cmd[1] = 0;
- scsi_cmd[2] = scsi_cmd[3] = scsi_cmd[5] = 0;
- scsi_cmd[4] = 0;
- return ioctl_internal_command(sdev, scsi_cmd,
- IOCTL_NORMAL_TIMEOUT, NORMAL_RETRIES);
+ return scsi_test_unit_ready(sdev, IOCTL_NORMAL_TIMEOUT,
+ NORMAL_RETRIES);
case SCSI_IOCTL_START_UNIT:
scsi_cmd[0] = START_STOP;
scsi_cmd[1] = 0;
===== drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 1.130 vs edited =====
--- 1.130/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2004-08-23 03:14:46 -05:00
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2004-08-24 22:08:51 -05:00
@@ -1572,6 +1572,34 @@
return ret;
}
+int
+scsi_test_unit_ready(struct scsi_device *sdev, int timeout, int retries)
+{
+ struct scsi_request *sreq;
+ char cmd[] = {
+ TEST_UNIT_READY, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+ };
+ int result;
+
+ sreq = scsi_allocate_request(sdev, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!sreq)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ sreq->sr_data_direction = DMA_NONE;
+ scsi_wait_req(sreq, cmd, NULL, 0, timeout, retries);
+
+ if ((driver_byte(sreq->sr_result) & DRIVER_SENSE)
+ && (sreq->sr_sense_buffer[2] & 0x0f) == UNIT_ATTENTION
+ && sdev->removable) {
+ sdev->changed = 1;
+ sreq->sr_result = 0;
+ }
+ result = sreq->sr_result;
+ scsi_release_request(sreq);
+ return result;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_test_unit_ready);
+
/**
* scsi_device_set_state - Take the given device through the device
* state model.
===== drivers/scsi/sd.c 1.157 vs edited =====
--- 1.157/drivers/scsi/sd.c 2004-08-24 18:09:03 -05:00
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/sd.c 2004-08-24 22:36:10 -05:00
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@
*/
retval = -ENODEV;
if (scsi_block_when_processing_errors(sdp))
- retval = scsi_ioctl(sdp, SCSI_IOCTL_TEST_UNIT_READY, NULL);
+ retval = scsi_test_unit_ready(sdp, SD_TIMEOUT, SD_MAX_RETRIES);
/*
* Unable to test, unit probably not ready. This usually
===== drivers/scsi/sr.c 1.114 vs edited =====
--- 1.114/drivers/scsi/sr.c 2004-08-12 19:03:53 -05:00
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/sr.c 2004-08-24 22:39:41 -05:00
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
return -EINVAL;
}
- retval = scsi_ioctl(cd->device, SCSI_IOCTL_TEST_UNIT_READY, NULL);
+ retval = scsi_test_unit_ready(cd->device, SR_TIMEOUT, MAX_RETRIES);
if (retval) {
/* Unable to test, unit probably not ready. This usually
* means there is no disc in the drive. Mark as changed,
===== include/scsi/scsi_device.h 1.21 vs edited =====
--- 1.21/include/scsi/scsi_device.h 2004-08-22 20:06:22 -05:00
+++ edited/include/scsi/scsi_device.h 2004-08-24 22:11:48 -05:00
@@ -185,6 +185,8 @@
extern int scsi_mode_sense(struct scsi_device *sdev, int dbd, int modepage,
unsigned char *buffer, int len, int timeout,
int retries, struct scsi_mode_data *data);
+extern int scsi_test_unit_ready(struct scsi_device *sdev, int timeout,
+ int retries);
extern int scsi_device_set_state(struct scsi_device *sdev,
enum scsi_device_state state);
extern int scsi_device_quiesce(struct scsi_device *sdev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-25 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-21 18:38 2.6.8.1-mm3 Mikael Pettersson
2004-08-21 19:14 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Patrick Mansfield
2004-08-21 19:24 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 James Bottomley
2004-08-21 21:47 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-25 3:50 ` James Bottomley [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-21 17:15 2.6.8.1-mm3 Mikael Pettersson
2004-08-21 14:43 2.6.8.1-mm3 Mikael Pettersson
2004-08-21 16:02 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 James Bottomley
2004-08-20 10:19 2.6.8.1-mm3 Andrew Morton
2004-08-20 11:46 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Russell King
2004-08-20 15:44 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 16:57 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 17:08 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 18:55 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Andrew Morton
2004-08-20 19:56 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 20:02 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-20 23:31 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Anton Blanchard
2004-08-21 0:03 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 7:04 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-21 15:22 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 19:59 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-21 20:24 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 20:35 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-23 9:02 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 David Mosberger
2004-08-23 16:27 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 wli
2004-08-23 18:18 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-24 7:24 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 David Mosberger
2004-08-20 18:46 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-21 1:26 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Nick Piggin
2004-08-21 20:05 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-22 1:27 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-22 2:11 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Nick Piggin
2004-08-22 15:44 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Jesse Barnes
2004-08-21 17:37 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-22 13:02 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 18:51 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 R. J. Wysocki
2004-08-22 4:32 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Thomas Davis
2004-08-22 4:48 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Andrew Morton
2004-08-22 4:58 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Nick Piggin
2004-08-22 6:26 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Thomas Davis
2004-08-22 6:51 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Pete Zaitcev
2004-08-22 15:11 ` 2.6.8.1-mm3 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093405836.2206.447.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox