From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Todd Poynor <tpoynor@mvista.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tim.bird@am.sony.com, dsingleton@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Configure IDE probe delays
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:53:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093629202.837.37.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wtzkmq4l.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 13:45, Greg Stark wrote:
> Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> writes:
>
> > I wonder if 83 probes are really necessary. Maybe this could be
> > optimized a bit.
>
> Or if the kernel could be doing something useful during that time. I don't
> suppose it's possible to probe two different ide interfaces at the same time,
> is it?
>
Did the patch to move this into a #define ever get merged? Seems like a
no brainer, as it eliminates a magic number.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-27 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-30 19:11 [PATCH] Configure IDE probe delays Todd Poynor
2004-07-30 21:36 ` Lee Revell
2004-07-30 22:35 ` Alan Cox
2004-07-31 0:12 ` Lee Revell
[not found] ` <200407311434.59604.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2004-07-31 18:00 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-27 17:45 ` Greg Stark
2004-08-27 17:53 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2004-08-27 18:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-27 18:08 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-27 18:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-09-01 13:20 ` Mark Lord
2004-09-01 14:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-01 15:30 ` Mark Lord
2004-09-01 15:36 ` Mark Lord
2004-09-01 19:36 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 18:42 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-01 15:06 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-01 19:08 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02 16:04 ` Mark Lord
2004-09-01 15:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-07-31 18:06 ` Lee Revell
2004-07-31 19:35 ` Alan Cox
2004-07-31 21:35 ` Lee Revell
2004-07-31 21:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-07-31 22:12 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-04 17:30 ` Anthony de Boer
2004-08-05 21:39 ` Tim Bird
2004-07-31 0:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-03 17:47 ` Mark Lord
2004-08-06 15:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-06 19:29 ` Tim Bird
2004-08-06 20:46 ` Todd Poynor
2004-08-02 21:56 ` Tim Bird
2004-08-02 21:01 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093629202.837.37.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dsingleton@mvista.com \
--cc=gsstark@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
--cc=tpoynor@mvista.com \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox