From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: SMP Panic caused by [PATCH] sched: consolidate sched domains
Date: 29 Aug 2004 09:39:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093786747.1708.8.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
This patch causes an immediate panic when the secondary processors come
on-line because sd->next is NULL.
The fix is to use cpu_possible_map instead of nodemask (which expands,
probably erroneously, to cpu_online_map in the non-numa case).
Any use of cpu_online_map in initialisation code is almost invariably
wrong, so please don't do it in future.
I know I'm sounding like a broken record, but it would be a lot easier
to spot mistakes like this immediately if every arch used the hotplug
paths to bring SMP up.
Anyway, the attached fixes our panic.
James
===== kernel/sched.c 1.329 vs edited =====
--- 1.329/kernel/sched.c 2004-08-24 02:08:09 -07:00
+++ edited/kernel/sched.c 2004-08-29 06:17:26 -07:00
@@ -3756,7 +3756,7 @@
sd = &per_cpu(phys_domains, i);
group = cpu_to_phys_group(i);
*sd = SD_CPU_INIT;
- sd->span = nodemask;
+ sd->span = cpu_possible_map;
sd->parent = p;
sd->groups = &sched_group_phys[group];
@@ -3790,7 +3790,7 @@
if (cpus_empty(nodemask))
continue;
- init_sched_build_groups(sched_group_phys, nodemask,
+ init_sched_build_groups(sched_group_phys, cpu_possible_map,
&cpu_to_phys_group);
}
next reply other threads:[~2004-08-29 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-29 13:39 James Bottomley [this message]
2004-08-29 16:48 ` SMP Panic caused by [PATCH] sched: consolidate sched domains Jesse Barnes
2004-08-29 16:58 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-29 17:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-29 17:16 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-30 19:11 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-08-29 17:24 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-29 17:48 ` Nathan Lynch
2004-08-29 22:59 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-29 17:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:09 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-29 17:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 23:13 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093786747.1708.8.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox