From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pmarques@grupopie.com, greg@kroah.com, nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: pwc+pwcx is not illegal
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:00:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093788018.27901.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0408271226400.14196@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Gwe, 2004-08-27 at 20:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So stop whining about it. The driver got removed because the author asked
> for it.
Please put it back, minus the hooks so the rest of the world can use it.
If not please remove every line of code I've even written because I
don't like the new attitude .. so ner..
Point made ? We can't go around throwing out drivers because the author
had a tantrum. Its also trivial to move the decompressor to user space
where it should be anyway. Similarly the driver is useful without the
binary stuff.
Or do we need a -ac tree again where this time -ac is "added camera" ;)
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-29 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-27 19:18 pwc+pwcx is not illegal Albert Cahalan
2004-08-27 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-27 20:06 ` Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-27 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-27 20:24 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-27 20:26 ` Paul Jakma
2004-08-30 17:41 ` Brian Litzinger
2004-08-27 20:38 ` David Ford
2004-08-27 20:57 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-27 21:04 ` Greg KH
2004-08-27 21:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-29 14:00 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-08-29 16:33 ` Nemosoft Unv.
2004-08-29 15:42 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-29 17:17 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Randy.Dunlap
2004-08-29 17:16 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2004-08-27 19:34 ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-27 21:34 ` Albert Cahalan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-28 8:15 Gabucino
2004-08-28 10:30 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 12:18 Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-28 13:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-28 15:24 ` Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-29 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-01 22:51 ` Rogier Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093788018.27901.35.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl \
--cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox