From: Eric St-Laurent <ericstl34@sympatico.ca>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>,
Felipe Alfaro Solana <lkml@felipe-alfaro.com>,
Daniel Schmitt <pnambic@unu.nu>,
Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com,
"P.O. Gaillard" <pierre-olivier.gaillard@fr.thalesgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R0
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 23:17:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1094181447.4815.6.camel@orbiter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1094171082.19760.7.camel@krustophenia.net>
> Judging from these graphs, all of the latency issues are solved, at
> least on my UP hardware, and the latencies seem to be getting very close
> to the limits of what the hardware can do:
>
> http://krustophenia.net/testresults.php?dataset=2.6.9-rc1-Q6#/var/www/2.6.9-rc1-Q6/jack-test-1
>
> The worst case latency is only 160 usecs, and the vast majority fall
> into the pattern from 0 to 120 usecs. All of the spikes above 120 are
> almost certainly caused by netdev_max_backlog. However these are not
> long enough to cause any problems with my workload; the lowest practical
> latency for audio work is around 0.66 ms (32 frames at 48khz).
Lee,
A few weeks ago you wrote that "the worst latency I was able to trigger
was 46 usecs", now it's 160 usecs.
Ingo has done much work on his patches since then.
Why the worst latency is higher now? I presume that the latency
measurements technique are more accurate and the 46 usecs was
inaccurate?
Ref: http://uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0407.3/0994.html
Best regards,
Eric St-Laurent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-03 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-30 19:13 [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-08-30 19:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-01 12:31 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5 - netdev_max_back_log is too small P.O. Gaillard
2004-09-01 13:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 11:24 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q6 - network is no longer smooth P.O. Gaillard
2004-09-02 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 15:26 ` P.O. Gaillard
2004-08-31 8:49 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 6:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 6:55 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q8 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 7:04 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 7:31 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02 7:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 1:10 ` Rusty Russell
2004-09-02 23:25 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02 23:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 23:32 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 11:10 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q9 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 12:14 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-02 13:16 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-02 13:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 14:38 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-02 21:57 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R0 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 22:06 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-02 22:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 22:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03 0:24 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03 3:17 ` Eric St-Laurent [this message]
2004-09-03 6:26 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03 6:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 6:49 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03 7:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 7:40 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03 7:50 ` Free Ekanayaka
2004-09-03 8:05 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03 9:05 ` Free Ekanayaka
2004-09-03 9:25 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R1 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 9:50 ` Luke Yelavich
2004-09-03 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 10:43 ` Luke Yelavich
2004-09-03 11:33 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-03 11:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 12:05 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-03 16:14 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-03 17:36 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-09-03 11:36 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R2 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 8:09 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R0 Luke Yelavich
2004-09-03 8:13 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03 8:21 ` Luke Yelavich
2004-09-03 12:52 ` Luke Yelavich
2004-09-03 18:09 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-03 11:04 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-03 17:02 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-03 20:40 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-03 17:10 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-03 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 18:36 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-03 19:30 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R3 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 19:49 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-04 3:39 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-04 3:43 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-04 6:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-04 12:28 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-04 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-04 10:16 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-04 14:35 ` K.R. Foley
2004-09-04 20:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 18:39 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-R0 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-03 18:41 ` K.R. Foley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1094181447.4815.6.camel@orbiter \
--to=ericstl34@sympatico.ca \
--cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=kr@cybsft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@felipe-alfaro.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pierre-olivier.gaillard@fr.thalesgroup.com \
--cc=pnambic@unu.nu \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox