From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266531AbUIEMO2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2004 08:14:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266543AbUIEMO2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2004 08:14:28 -0400 Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.237]:11920 "EHLO pfepc.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266531AbUIEMOZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2004 08:14:25 -0400 Subject: Scheduler experiences From: Kasper Sandberg To: LKML Mailinglist Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 14:14:24 +0200 Message-Id: <1094386464.18114.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.93 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey, i wonder which scheduler you people have the best experiences with, staircase or nicksched? personally i were using nicksched for a long time, but then i tried staircase, and i like it overall more, with nicksched its like, 1 process gets good prioity, so that if tvtime is running, it runs perfect, but moving windows and stuff will be not so fluid. with staircase, the overall performance is not as fast, but interactivity is really good, like tvtime runs fine, moving windows are fast as lightening, setiathome can also run perfect. -- Kasper Sandberg