From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Richard A Nelson <cowboy@debian.org>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm4 kjournald oops (repeatable)
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:16:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1094685396.1362.245.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409081604060.6248@hygvzn-guhyr.pnirva.bet>
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 19:07, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 10:04, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6b93
> > > > > ...
> > > > > EIP: 0060:[__journal_clean_checkpoint_list+199/240] Not tainted VLI
> > > >
> > > > This might have been caused by a fishy latency-reduction patch. I today
> > > > dropped that patch so could you please test next -mm and let me know?
> > >
> > > That, or preempt. If the next -mm still breaks, time to hunt for the
> > > preempt problem, I guess.
> >
> > Ok, if it still fails (I'll have to wait until this afternoon for the
> > true test - dpkg breaks it everytime), I'll check out preempt.
>
> Well, it looks like backing out the patch was sufficient, I've made it
> through the torture that is a dpkg install (70+meg).
>
> So we needn't (at this time) look to preempt.
Hmm, I have been running this patch for weeks as part of the voluntary
preemption patches, and put it through every torture test I can think
of, with nary an Oops. None of the other VP testers have reported
problems either. Maybe this is some interaction between that patch and
something else in -mm.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-08 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 0:16 2.6.9-rc1-mm4 kjournald oops (repeatable) Richard A Nelson
2004-09-08 9:04 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-08 9:23 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-09-08 17:12 ` Richard A Nelson
2004-09-08 23:07 ` Richard A Nelson
2004-09-08 23:16 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2004-09-08 23:51 ` Richard A Nelson
2004-09-09 21:56 ` Bongani Hlope
2004-09-09 20:20 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-09-09 20:27 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-09 22:39 ` Bongani Hlope
2004-09-08 17:11 ` Richard A Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1094685396.1362.245.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cowboy@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox