Re: [PATCH] Realtime LSM

Lee Revell
2004-10-23T00:41:35Z

On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 18:59 -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> writes:
>
> > - less generic variable names
> > - s/any/rt_any/
> > - s/gid/rt_gid/
> > - s/mlock/rt_mlock/
>
> Is there a compelling reason for changing all the parameter names?
>
> I would prefer not to do that. It is incompatible for our current
> user base, and really does not seem like an improvement. Those names
> only appear in the context of `realtime', so the `rt_' is completely
> redundant. For example...

I think the reason was to make the code more readable. How about just
mapping the parameters to internal names by prepending rt_?

Lee