From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New QStor SATA/RAID Driver for 2.6.9-rc2
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:00:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095177622.16990.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41471163.10709@rtr.ca>
On Maw, 2004-09-14 at 16:42, Mark Lord wrote:
> Please email me any errors or corrections you may deem necessary
> for kernel inclusion.
Nothing says its GPL
qstor_printk uses a fixed length buffer yet we have vprintk. It also
appears to be full of magic maybe formatting stuff to optionally insert
things like DRIVER_NAME. Is there a reason for not just using printk ?
qstore_test_logbuf returns the flags value across functions. Not all
platforms can support this (see Rusty's unreliable guide)
What is qstor_alloc about ?
What happens if qstor_scsi_proc_write is passed a length of
0xFFFFFFFF. You seem to have no upper bound nor any trap on the
alloc overflow. Seems a horrible way to expose the raid commands too ?
qstor_exec_special_cmd doesn't consider datalen overflow. I'm not sure
what stops a lot of parallel callers here but not sure if thats fixed by
the command queueing ?
Correct ioctl return is -ENOTTY for unknown (thats a mistake still in
many existing drivers so no suprise its still being copied)
The ioremap_nocache should just be ioremap I believe
Announces for the driver should be KERN_INFO IMHO
Reset code seems to be spending a lot of time with irq's off ?
qstor_dealloc_device checks dev->id != NULL - kfree(NULL) is an allowed
no-op btw.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-14 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-14 15:42 [PATCH] New QStor SATA/RAID Driver for 2.6.9-rc2 Mark Lord
2004-09-14 16:00 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-09-14 17:14 ` Mark Lord
2004-09-14 17:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-14 17:27 ` Mark Lord
2004-09-14 17:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-14 17:51 ` Mark Lord
2004-09-14 17:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-14 18:03 ` Mark Lord
2004-09-14 18:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-14 18:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-14 18:25 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-14 18:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-14 18:51 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-15 2:39 ` Mark Lord
2004-09-15 2:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-15 12:35 ` Mark Lord
[not found] <414711AC.5030200@rtr.ca>
[not found] ` <41471A84.4090200@pobox.com>
[not found] ` <4147C38C.3000104@torque.net>
[not found] ` <414839F0.20008@rtr.ca>
2004-09-15 17:01 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1095177622.16990.48.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox