Re: [patch] sched: fix scheduling latencies for !PREEMPT kernels

Ingo Molnar
2004-09-14T13:27:46Z

* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> Could these ones go up a level? We break down scanning into 32 page
> chunks, so I don't think it needs to be checked every page.

not really - we can occasionally get into high latencies even with a
single page - if a single page is mapped by alot of processes.

Ingo