From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, 2.6] a simple FIFO implementation
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:25:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095247481.19893.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040915102003.GA21917@sd291.sivit.org>
On Mer, 2004-09-15 at 11:20, Stelian Pop wrote:
> > An initial implementation follows below. Comments ?
>
> Two days later, I've got no comments at all.
>
> Is this because the idea or the implementation are just stupid ?
I certainly made no comment because it seemed completely correct and
needed no comment. If your drivers are using it I'd like to see it just
get merged
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-15 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-13 13:52 [RFC, 2.6] a simple FIFO implementation Stelian Pop
2004-09-15 10:20 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-15 11:10 ` Tonnerre
2004-09-15 11:25 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-09-15 13:27 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-09-15 14:21 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-15 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-16 6:43 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-16 7:04 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-16 10:45 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-16 13:57 ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-16 14:09 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-16 15:45 ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-16 15:59 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-16 15:09 ` Buddy Lucas
2004-09-16 15:29 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-16 15:51 ` Buddy Lucas
2004-09-16 15:52 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-16 16:07 ` Buddy Lucas
2004-09-16 18:30 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-16 22:52 ` Buddy Lucas
2004-09-16 17:00 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-16 18:09 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-17 0:18 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-17 10:24 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-17 11:28 ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-17 11:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-09-17 12:24 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-17 12:37 ` Duncan Sands
2004-09-17 12:48 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-17 13:00 ` Duncan Sands
2004-09-17 13:05 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-17 13:16 ` Duncan Sands
2004-09-17 13:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-17 13:36 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-17 13:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-17 14:00 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-17 15:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-17 14:47 ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-17 12:52 ` James R Bruce
2004-09-17 15:48 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-17 16:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-17 16:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-09-17 20:50 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-17 21:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-17 21:54 ` Ryan Cumming
2004-09-17 22:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-17 22:14 ` Ryan Cumming
2004-09-17 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-18 0:07 ` Ryan Cumming
2004-09-17 22:29 ` Ryan Cumming
2004-09-18 3:41 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-09-18 7:56 ` Ryan Cumming
2004-09-17 22:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-20 15:14 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-20 18:01 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2004-09-20 18:22 ` Stelian Pop
2004-09-20 19:00 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-09-16 15:57 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-09-17 10:25 ` Stelian Pop
[not found] <260353727@toto.iv>
2004-09-17 1:00 ` Peter Chubb
2004-09-17 5:45 ` Chris Friesen
2004-09-17 11:58 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-17 10:32 ` Stelian Pop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1095247481.19893.0.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stelian@popies.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox