From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265970AbUITDik (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:38:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265971AbUITDik (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:38:40 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:46781 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265970AbUITDii (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:38:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [BUG] ub.c badness in current bk From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: Linux Kernel list In-Reply-To: <20040919202126.1073925b@lembas.zaitcev.lan> References: <20040917002935.77620d1d@lembas.zaitcev.lan> <1095414394.13531.77.camel@gaston> <20040917090448.32ff763c@lembas.zaitcev.lan> <1095469463.3574.2.camel@gaston> <1095473325.3574.4.camel@gaston> <20040919202126.1073925b@lembas.zaitcev.lan> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1095651446.31131.48.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:37:27 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 13:21, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > How about this deal. I'll add a clearly marked workaround like the > appended patch, and then ask you to try again when a proper spin-up gets > implemented? Ok, I'll give it a try, but you don't need to call it "benh's key" :) I think everybody at kernel summit got one of those no ? :) Ben. > Note that the patch is against -mm where the REQUEST SENSE is set correctly. > I strongly suggest you to use ub from -mm. Linus' tree is behind. > > Also, I might have screwed something along the way, so if it fails, please > send me dmesg and the contents of /sys/..../diag. I will later today or tomorrow, thanks ! Ben.