public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Boot failure with 2.6.9-rc2-bk latest in usb/hid-core.c
Date: 21 Sep 2004 10:47:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095778029.2467.45.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040921081047.GA10757@ucw.cz>

On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 04:10, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> There were changes in the function that prints the above message,
> however they were indentation only. I really doubt it could be the HID
> changes I did.

Well, I verified that it works before this merge

torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org|ChangeSet|20040916140404|15905

and doesn't with it (this was Linus pulling in your input tree).

> It looks like there is either a problem with ACPI IRQ routing that when
> enabling the EHCI controller IRQ does something bad to the OHCI
> controllers, or the EHCI driver itself does something bad to the OHCI
> controllers. (Afte all, the controllers share their ports.)
> 
> Try disabling EHCI in your config to confirm my theory.

Yes, disabling EHCI in the config allows boot.

This is what lspci says about the USB controller:

0000:a0:01.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41) (prog-if 10
[OHCI])
        Subsystem: NEC Corporation USB
        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 128, IRQ 57
        Memory at 00000000d0022000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2

0000:a0:01.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41) (prog-if 10
[OHCI])
        Subsystem: NEC Corporation USB
        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 128, IRQ 58
        Memory at 00000000d0021000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2

0000:a0:01.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 02) (prog-if
20 [EHCI])
        Subsystem: NEC Corporation USB 2.0
        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 128, IRQ 59
        Memory at 00000000d0020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2

So it looks like ACPI is routing the IRQ's corectly.  Just to confirm,
here's the ACPI routing probe from boot:

ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:a0:01.0[A] -> GSI 38 (level, low) -> IRQ 57
GSI 39 (level, low) -> CPU 0 (0x0000) vector 58
ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:a0:01.1[B] -> GSI 39 (level, low) -> IRQ 58
GSI 40 (level, low) -> CPU 0 (0x0000) vector 59
ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:a0:01.2[C] -> GSI 40 (level, low) -> IRQ 59

Anything else you need?

James



      reply	other threads:[~2004-09-21 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-19 16:08 Boot failure with 2.6.9-rc2-bk latest in usb/hid-core.c James Bottomley
2004-09-21  8:10 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-09-21 14:47   ` James Bottomley [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1095778029.2467.45.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox