From: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
To: John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
Cc: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>,
Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>, Robert Love <rml@novell.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.9.2
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:46:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095904012.11637.81.camel@orca.madrabbit.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1095820046.22558.4.camel@vertex>
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 19:27, John McCutchan wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 11:43, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > Edgar Toernig wrote:
> > > Robert Love wrote:
> > >
> > >> struct inotify_event {
> > >> int wd;
> > >> int mask;
> > >>- char filename[256];
> > >>+ char filename[PATH_MAX];
> > >> };
> > >
> > >
> > > You really want to shove >4kB per event to userspace???
> >
> > Ouch.
> >
> > Maybe make it variable-size? On average it would likely be shorter.
> >
> > struct inotify_event {
> > int wd;
> > int mask;
> > short namelen;
> > char filename[0];
> > };
>
> This makes reading events from inotify a pain, first you need to read up
> to namelen, then read namelen more bytes.
>
Not the case. A mildly smarter userspace program would merely read
everything outstanding (or everything up to a fixed buffer length), and
then unserialize the events based on the boundaries it can figure out
from the first portion of the structure.
This is a way common technique.
At least in code I write, anyway :-).
Ray
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-23 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 3:56 [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.9.2 John McCutchan
2004-09-20 21:52 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 5:21 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 15:34 ` Edgar Toernig
2004-09-21 15:43 ` Chris Friesen
2004-09-22 2:27 ` John McCutchan
2004-09-23 1:46 ` Ray Lee [this message]
2004-09-23 3:42 ` John McCutchan
2004-09-23 4:52 ` Ray Lee
2004-09-23 5:10 ` Robert Love
2004-09-23 5:29 ` Ray Lee
2004-09-21 15:46 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 5:26 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 5:44 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 16:04 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 18:56 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 20:55 ` Robert Love
2004-09-22 2:32 ` John McCutchan
2004-09-22 3:49 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1095904012.11637.81.camel@orca.madrabbit.org \
--to=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
--cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=froese@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@novell.com \
--cc=ttb@tentacle.dhs.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox