From: John McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>,
Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>, Robert Love <rml@novell.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.9.2
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:42:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1095910956.9652.2.camel@vertex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1095904012.11637.81.camel@orca.madrabbit.org>
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 21:46, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 19:27, John McCutchan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 11:43, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > > Edgar Toernig wrote:
> > > > Robert Love wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> struct inotify_event {
> > > >> int wd;
> > > >> int mask;
> > > >>- char filename[256];
> > > >>+ char filename[PATH_MAX];
> > > >> };
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You really want to shove >4kB per event to userspace???
> > >
> > > Ouch.
> > >
> > > Maybe make it variable-size? On average it would likely be shorter.
> > >
> > > struct inotify_event {
> > > int wd;
> > > int mask;
> > > short namelen;
> > > char filename[0];
> > > };
> >
> > This makes reading events from inotify a pain, first you need to read up
> > to namelen, then read namelen more bytes.
> >
>
> Not the case. A mildly smarter userspace program would merely read
> everything outstanding (or everything up to a fixed buffer length), and
> then unserialize the events based on the boundaries it can figure out
> from the first portion of the structure.
>
> This is a way common technique.
>
> At least in code I write, anyway :-).
Of course this is possible, but the inotify kernel driver only allows userspace
program to read in event sized chunks (So that the event queue
handling is kept simple)
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-23 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 3:56 [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.9.2 John McCutchan
2004-09-20 21:52 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 5:21 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 15:34 ` Edgar Toernig
2004-09-21 15:43 ` Chris Friesen
2004-09-22 2:27 ` John McCutchan
2004-09-23 1:46 ` Ray Lee
2004-09-23 3:42 ` John McCutchan [this message]
2004-09-23 4:52 ` Ray Lee
2004-09-23 5:10 ` Robert Love
2004-09-23 5:29 ` Ray Lee
2004-09-21 15:46 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 5:26 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 5:44 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 16:04 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 18:56 ` Robert Love
2004-09-21 20:55 ` Robert Love
2004-09-22 2:32 ` John McCutchan
2004-09-22 3:49 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1095910956.9652.2.camel@vertex \
--to=ttb@tentacle.dhs.org \
--cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=froese@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
--cc=rml@novell.com \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox