From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 swsusp bug report.
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 07:59:42 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1096235982.10015.1.camel@desktop.cunninghams> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040926100442.GG10435@elf.ucw.cz>
Hi.
On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 20:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Are we still planning on having suspend2 replace swsusp eventually? It
> > was a lot of work to switch from those high order allocations, and if we
> > are still going to replace swsusp, perhaps it's would be a better use of
> > your time to do other things?
>
> I do not know if I'm more scared of swsusp1 to kill order-8
> allocations or if suspend2's two page sets scare me more. (Hooks
> suspend2 needs to stop all page cache activity are scary...)
Hooks to stop all page cache activity? I'm not sure what you mean.
> I certainly want some parts of suspend2 (like improved freezer, if it
> can be made small enough), but I'm no longer sure I want all of it. I
> expected many people complaining about highmem problems in swsusp1,
> and that just did not happen; SMP support turned out to be reasonably
> simple...
Okay. There are other advantages too, of course :>
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-26 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-24 2:19 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 swsusp bug report Kevin Fenzi
2004-09-24 14:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-24 21:09 ` Kevin Fenzi
2004-09-24 23:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 1:45 ` Kevin Fenzi
2004-09-25 11:53 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 12:22 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-25 12:56 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-25 13:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 12:56 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 13:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-25 13:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 15:45 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-25 22:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-26 10:04 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-26 21:59 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2004-09-26 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-27 10:12 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-26 16:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-26 18:39 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-25 10:15 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <2HO0C-4xh-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2I5b2-88s-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2I5E5-6h-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2I7Zd-1TK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-25 1:05 ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-09-25 10:16 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-10 18:17 ` Jan Rychter
2004-10-11 13:32 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 14:53 ` Jan Rychter
2004-10-17 19:10 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-17 21:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-10-11 9:56 ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-10-11 14:59 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 17:18 ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-10-11 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-12 8:55 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-13 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1096235982.10015.1.camel@desktop.cunninghams \
--to=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=kevin@scrye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox