From: Norbert van Nobelen <Norbert@edusupport.nl>
To: Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Microsoft claim 267% better peak performance than linux?
Date: 28 Sep 2004 10:09:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1096358943.21271.21.camel@linux.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040928075545.GA3298@cenedra.walrond.org>
Just the fact that the benchmark is this old, is a good reason to doubt
it.
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 09:55, Andrew Walrond wrote:
> I was pointed to this (rotating) banner advert at the top of www.eweek.com
>
> It claims that when comparing Red Hat AS2.1 with Windows Server 2003 on a dual processor machine, Windows Server 2003 gives 276% better peak performance, quoting Veritest as the source.
>
> I think the report in question must be this one
>
> http://download.microsoft.com/download/0/7/1/0715a190-70f5-4b0d-8ced-f9d1e046aa6a/netbench.pdf
>
> Its dated April 2003, so this was probably discussed a long time ago, but can anyone point me in the direction of an analysis/rebuttal of this report from the linux community? "Windows webserver gives 3x performance of linux" is something I need to be able to debunk, assuming it's inaccurate.
>
> Andrew
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Norbert van Nobelen
EduSupport
Postbus 95963
2509CZ Den Haag
T: 070-3280200
M: 06-43036586
F: 070-3280029
E: Norbert@edusupport.nl
I: www.edusupport.nl
B: ABN AMRO
R: 47.38.00.411
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-28 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-28 7:55 [OT] Microsoft claim 267% better peak performance than linux? Andrew Walrond
2004-09-28 8:05 ` Andrew Walrond
2004-09-28 8:09 ` Norbert van Nobelen [this message]
2004-09-28 15:24 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-09-28 12:35 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2004-09-28 13:11 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-09-29 19:28 ` Tonnerre
2004-09-28 16:04 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-09-28 12:59 ` Patrick Kiwitter- Mailinglist
2004-09-28 14:12 ` [OT] Linux Claims 100,000% larger installed base than Microsoft Jeff V. Merkey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1096358943.21271.21.camel@linux.local \
--to=norbert@edusupport.nl \
--cc=andrew@walrond.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox