public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Norbert van Nobelen <Norbert@edusupport.nl>
To: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Microsoft claim 267% better peak performance than linux?
Date: 28 Sep 2004 14:35:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1096374908.21271.38.camel@linux.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409281524.25187.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>

The document shows some interesting points though:
- They describe what they did to make redhat/apache perform better
- ISAPI is pretty fast compared to CGI (Didn't apache recently release a
programming interface which is cross platform and does something like
this too?)
- Multithreading works in their advantage (Compare 2003 normal against
multithreaded, maybe too little amount of apache threads running, or
some optimization needed in the linux kernel here?)
And last but not least:
WIndows 2003 suddenly realizes that is has a few CPU's left and starts
using them (-: See the graphs where there is a weird bent in the 8 CPU
curve.

And it still doesn't matter actually: 286% faster is still about 3 times
more expensive, which is the point on which is must be compared (lower
TCO because we are faster, so MS TCO is lower, but still too high)



On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 17:24, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 September 2004 07:55, Andrew Walrond wrote:
> > I was pointed to this (rotating) banner advert at the top of www.eweek.com
> >
> > It claims that when comparing Red Hat AS2.1 with Windows Server 2003 on a
> > dual processor machine, Windows Server 2003 gives 276% better peak
> > performance, quoting Veritest as the source.
> 
> It is very easy to 'slightly' misconfigure Linux machine so that it
> slows to a crawl. For webservers, classic way to do it is to force
> Apache to log a fqdn of incoming connections instead of numeric IP.
> 
> From pdf:
> > Microsoft commissioned VeriTest, a division of Lionbridge
> > Technologies, Inc., to conduct a series of tests comparing
> > the Web serving performance of the following server operating
> > system configurations running on a variety of server hardware
> > and processor configurations...
> 
> Do you seriously expect that MS-funded tests can ever find Linux
> to be faster?
-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Norbert van Nobelen
EduSupport

Postbus 95963
2509CZ Den Haag
T: 070-3280200
M: 06-43036586
F: 070-3280029
E: Norbert@edusupport.nl
I: www.edusupport.nl
B: ABN AMRO
R: 47.38.00.411


  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-28 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-28  7:55 [OT] Microsoft claim 267% better peak performance than linux? Andrew Walrond
2004-09-28  8:05 ` Andrew Walrond
2004-09-28  8:09 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2004-09-28 15:24 ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-09-28 12:35   ` Norbert van Nobelen [this message]
2004-09-28 13:11     ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-09-29 19:28       ` Tonnerre
2004-09-28 16:04     ` Denis Vlasenko
2004-09-28 12:59   ` Patrick Kiwitter- Mailinglist
2004-09-28 14:12   ` [OT] Linux Claims 100,000% larger installed base than Microsoft Jeff V. Merkey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1096374908.21271.38.camel@linux.local \
    --to=norbert@edusupport.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox