public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Al Borchers <alborchers@steinerpoint.com>
Cc: linux-usb-devel <linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: new locking in change_termios breaks USB serial drivers
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:36:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1096630567.21871.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <415D3408.8070201@steinerpoint.com>

On Gwe, 2004-10-01 at 11:40, Al Borchers wrote:
> Unfortunately, many USB serial drivers' set_termios functions
> send an urb to change the termios settings and sleep waiting for
> it to complete.
> 
> I just looked quickly, but it seems belkin_sa.c, digi_acceleport.c,
> ftdi_sio.c, io_ti.c, kl5usb105.c, mct_u232.c, pl2303.c, and whiteheat.c
> all sleep in their set_termios functions.
> 
> If this locking in change_termios() stays, we are going to have to
> fix set_termios in all of these drivers.  I am updating io_ti.c right
> now.

How much of a problem is this, would it make more sense to make the
termios locking also include a semaphore to serialize driver side events
and not the spin lock ?

We need some kind of locking there otherwise multiple parallel termios
setters resulting in truely strange occurences because driver authors
don't think about 64 parallel executions of ->change_termios()

I can switch the lock around if you want.

Alan


  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-01 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-01 10:40 new locking in change_termios breaks USB serial drivers Al Borchers
2004-10-01 11:36 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-10-01 16:24   ` Al Borchers
2004-10-01 15:49     ` Alan Cox
2004-10-01 18:14       ` [linux-usb-devel] " Al Borchers
2004-10-02 15:08         ` Alan Cox
2004-10-02 17:19           ` Al Borchers
2004-10-01 20:15     ` Stuart MacDonald
2004-10-01 17:42   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1096630567.21871.4.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=alborchers@steinerpoint.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox