Re: [RFC] ARM binutils feature churn causing kernel problems

[Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>]

On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 22:01, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Russell,
> 
> Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
> > + * This ignores the intensely annoying "mapping symbols" found
> > + * in ARM ELF files: $a, $t and $d.
> > + */
> > +static inline int is_arm_mapping_symbol(const char *str)
> > +{
> > +	return str[0] == '$' && strchr("atd", str[1]) && str[2] == '\0';
> 
> str[2] can be '\0' or '.', since a mapping symbol can also be
> $[atd].<any> (because binutils doesn't like to generate duplicate
> local labels).

Color me confused...

Russell, I thought about not including any symbol which is not of form
"[A-Za-z0-9_]+" in kallsyms, for all archs: you are not the only one
with weird-ass symbols.  Is it that you want these mapping symbols in
/proc/kallsyms but ignored in backtraces, or you don't need them in
kallsyms altogether?

Thanks,
Rusty.
-- 
Anyone who quotes me in their signature is an idiot -- Rusty Russell