From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>,
chrisw@osdl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] lsm: add bsdjail module
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:06:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1097150790.31528.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041006162620.4c378320.akpm@osdl.org>
On Iau, 2004-10-07 at 00:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I don't recall anyone requesting this feature. Tell me why we should add
> it to Linux?
Subject to the code cleanups and stuff you've noted I'd actually like to
see BSD jail stuff in our security modules because it has the virtue of
simplicity. If it can be extended to do all of vserver even better. J
Random Admin has a good chance at configuring BSD jails etups. J Random
Admin needs some serious tools that don't exist to set up SELinux the
same way.
In the security world simplicity is often a virtue, both in code and
concepts.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-07 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-06 20:21 (patch 1/3) lsm: add control over /proc/<pid> visibility Serge Hallyn
2004-10-06 20:24 ` [patch 1/3] lsm: add bsdjail module Serge Hallyn
2004-10-06 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-07 4:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-07 6:18 ` James Morris
2004-10-07 6:22 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-07 16:06 ` Chris Wright
2004-10-07 18:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-07 18:52 ` Chris Wright
2004-10-07 20:56 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-10 6:24 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-10-07 12:06 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-10-07 19:01 ` [patch 2/3] " Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-07 19:42 ` Chris Wright
2004-10-07 20:05 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-08 18:05 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-10 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-10 11:31 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-10 11:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-11 13:47 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-12 7:00 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-10-12 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-12 12:27 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-10-20 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 19:18 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-10-12 13:11 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-12 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-12 22:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-10-13 0:58 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-13 1:09 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-10-13 1:22 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2004-10-13 15:26 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-10-13 1:11 ` Chris Wright
2004-10-13 14:25 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-10-06 20:25 ` [patch 3/3] lsm: add bsdjail documentation Serge Hallyn
2004-10-07 22:17 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-10-08 20:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-22 1:51 [patch 1/3] lsm: add bsdjail module Colin Walters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1097150790.31528.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox