From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267483AbUJLSXs (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:23:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267360AbUJLSOj (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:14:39 -0400 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:14556 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266572AbUJLSMz (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:12:55 -0400 Subject: Re: CD/DVD burn failed from non root user From: Lee Revell To: viaprog@lic1.vsi.ru Cc: linux-kernel , superpunk , Sergey Kondratiev , semen@basdesign.ru In-Reply-To: <1097548634.1440.6.camel@krustophenia.net> References: <416B4004.7050309@lic1.vsi.ru> <1097548634.1440.6.camel@krustophenia.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1097604288.1553.53.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:04:49 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 22:37, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 22:23, Igor A. Valcov wrote: > > And in general it would be quite good to solve this problem in a > > civilized way :) > > Also, this is hard to do when your mail server blocks me with "553 5.3.0 > REJECT Spam not accepted". Please fix your filter, I am not running a > spamhaus here. > Here is my reply. Your spam filter is STILL bouncing my mail. -- Are you saying DCANet is a spamhaus? That is crazy, we are an ISP with 15,000 customers, of course you have received spam from them once or twice. All we can do when we catch a customer spamming (usually due to a hacked machine) is terminate their access. We cannot go back in time and un-send the spam. I have never had anyone on LKML bounce mail from DCANet. So, the problem is at YOUR END. If you are accusing DCANet of being a spamhaus then please forward me one shred of evidence that DCANet has ever spammed you. -- Anyway, just to keep this thread from being a completely OT waste of time, the code that your patch removes was put there for a reason. It fixes a security hole. There was a long thread about it on LKML last month. Posting a patch that just rips this code out is not productive. Lee