From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, akpm@digeo.com
Subject: Re: 4level page tables for Linux
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:48:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1097606902.10652.203.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041012135919.GB20992@wotan.suse.de>
@@ -110,13 +115,18 @@ int install_file_pte(struct mm_struct *m
unsigned long addr, unsigned long pgoff, pgprot_t prot)
{
...
+ pml4 = pml4_offset(mm, addr);
+
+ spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
+ pgd = pgd_alloc(mm, pml4, addr);
+ if (!pgd)
+ goto err_unlock;
Locking isn't needed for access to the pml4? This is a wee bit
different from pgd's and I didn't see any documentation about it
anywhere. Could be confusing.
+++ linux-2.6.9rc4-4level/mm/memory.c
...
+#undef inline
+#define inline
+unsigned long caddr;
Is this just for debugging?
+static inline void free_one_pml4(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pml4_t *pml4,
+ unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
+{
...
+ do {
+ caddr = addr;
+ free_one_pgd(tlb, pgd);
+ free++;
+ addr = (addr + PGDIR_SIZE) & PGDIR_MASK;
+ pgd++;
+ } while (addr && addr < end);
If someone attempts to clear an address which is in the top PGDIR_SIZE
bytes of memory, this will overflow. Is that an issue?
There also seems to be quite a bit of churn in the copy_*_range()
functions that isn't completely related to the pml4 changes. Should
that get broken out?
-- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-12 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-12 13:59 4level page tables for Linux Andi Kleen
2004-10-12 18:48 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2004-10-12 19:03 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-12 19:08 ` 4level page tables for Linux II Andi Kleen
2004-10-13 18:41 ` 4level page tables for Linux Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-13 19:35 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-13 20:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-18 17:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-10-18 17:21 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-18 17:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-13 23:22 Albert Cahalan
2004-10-13 23:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-14 1:15 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-10-14 9:25 linux
2004-10-14 11:15 ` Robin Holt
2004-10-17 2:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1097606902.10652.203.camel@localhost \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox