From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Jan Rychter <jan@rychter.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 swsusp bug report.
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 07:40:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1098049218.3489.9.camel@desktop.cunninghams> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041017191031.GA7476@elf.ucw.cz>
Hi.
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 05:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
> You can have code that does not panic, does not crash, does not
> corrupt your data, never fails to suspend and is in Linus' tree.
>
> ...no, that is too good. It sounds like a fairy tale.
>
> So pick any four.
> Pavel
>
> PS: And it is real. We have conflicting goals here and I consider
> "refuses to suspend" least critical.
I'm going for all five! You're probably right, nevertheless. I can't say
suspend2 _never_ fails to suspend. It's just very rare.
Regards,
Nigel
--
Nigel Cunningham
Pastoral Worker
Christian Reformed Church of Tuggeranong
PO Box 1004, Tuggeranong, ACT 2901
Many today claim to be tolerant. True tolerance, however, can cope with others
being intolerant.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-17 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2HO0C-4xh-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2I5b2-88s-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2I5E5-6h-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2I7Zd-1TK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-25 1:05 ` 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 swsusp bug report Pascal Schmidt
2004-09-25 10:16 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-10 18:17 ` Jan Rychter
2004-10-11 13:32 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 14:53 ` Jan Rychter
2004-10-17 19:10 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-17 21:40 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2004-10-11 9:56 ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-10-11 14:59 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 17:18 ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-10-11 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-12 8:55 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-13 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-14 21:47 ` swsusp: 8-order allocation failure on demand (was: Re: 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 swsusp bug report.) Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-14 21:54 ` swsusp: 8-order allocation failure on demand (update) Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-16 16:43 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-16 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-16 20:40 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-16 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-16 21:25 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-24 2:19 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 swsusp bug report Kevin Fenzi
2004-09-24 14:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-24 21:09 ` Kevin Fenzi
2004-09-24 23:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 1:45 ` Kevin Fenzi
2004-09-25 11:53 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 12:22 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-25 12:56 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-25 13:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 12:56 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 13:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-25 13:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 15:45 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-25 22:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-26 10:04 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-26 21:59 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-26 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-27 10:12 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-26 16:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-26 18:39 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-25 10:15 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1098049218.3489.9.camel@desktop.cunninghams \
--to=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=jan@rychter.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox