From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270590AbUJULGt (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:06:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270672AbUJULFU (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:05:20 -0400 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:18908 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270680AbUJUKxR (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:53:17 -0400 Subject: Re: Proposal: Desktop kernel bk tree/patchset. From: Alan Cox To: ncunningham@linuxmail.org Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1098344977.4146.21.camel@desktop.cunninghams> References: <1098344977.4146.21.camel@desktop.cunninghams> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098349248.17067.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:00:48 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Iau, 2004-10-21 at 08:49, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi all. > > I want to get some feedback. I'm considering making a tree/patchset > aimed at the desktop user: Linus kernel + PM, USB and so on patches, > Win4Lin patches and perhaps [I/O] scheduler improvements. > > What do people think? Can't do any harm on the whole. You might want to consult a lawyer before distributing win4lin hooks merged with the kernel however