From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:20:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1098883255.4097.12.camel@desktop.cunninghams> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1098882498.9497.17.camel@gaston>
Hi again.
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 23:08, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 23:01 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 22:06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > The problem has been observed on ppc, while this patch only affects
> > > i386...
> >
> > Another shot in the dark....
> >
> > Nothing interesting about /proc/interrupts?
>
> Nope, looked already, interrupts seem to flow normally... the box works,
> there are no errors or lost interrupts, it's just that disk IOs are
> _extremely_ slow...
One more, if I may... no processes sucking CPU? (That would indicate a
thread not properly handled by the refrigerating).
Regards,
Nigel
--
Nigel Cunningham
Pastoral Worker
Christian Reformed Church of Tuggeranong
PO Box 1004, Tuggeranong, ACT 2901
Everyone lives by faith. Some people just don't believe it.
Want proof? Try to prove that the theory of evolution is true.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-27 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-27 2:56 Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-27 6:24 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-27 11:20 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-10-27 12:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-27 12:13 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-10-27 13:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-10-27 13:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-27 13:20 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-27 14:18 Zachary Amsden
2004-10-27 22:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1098883255.4097.12.camel@desktop.cunninghams \
--to=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox