From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262885AbUJ1Wu4@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262885AbUJ1Wu4 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:50:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263107AbUJ1Wu4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:50:56 -0400
Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:36999 "EHLO gate.crashing.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262885AbUJ1WtM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:49:12 -0400
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: Concerns about our pci_{save,restore}_state()
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
       Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>,
       Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0410280149140.13935-100000@monsoon.he.net>
References: <1098677182.26697.21.camel@gaston>  <417C991C.2070806@pobox.com>
	 <1098685464.26695.32.camel@gaston>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.50.0410280149140.13935-100000@monsoon.he.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:44:22 +1000
Message-Id: <1099003462.29693.66.camel@gaston>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 01:50 -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote:

> What's wrong with that? They would be simple and straightforward, and
> could probably work to remove many of the quirks, too..

Right.

ben.