From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com, Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>,
Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>,
Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>,
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.stanford.edu>,
Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>,
jackit-devel <jackit-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4]
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 07:09:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1099224598.1459.28.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041031110039.4575e49c@mango.fruits.de>
On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 11:00 +0100, Florian Schmidt wrote:
> thanks for the patch (it has a little problem, since it uses prio 99 which
> is always equal or greater than the rtc thread prio. i changed it in my
> local version to accept a parameter).
OK good idea. As in the JACK case, the relative priorities of the RTC
irq thread and the test program should not matter as these two should
never contend - something is seriously wrong if both are ever runnable
at the same time.
Actually this raises an interesting point. Maybe all IRQ threads should
get the same RT priority by default, so we get FIFO scheduling among IRQ
threads. It seems like this would make it harder for IRQ threads to
starve each other. Then we only have to elevate the priority of the IRQ
thread(s) we are interested in.
Another idea is to allow SCHED_FIFO processes of equal priority to
preempt one another on a LIFO basis. Wouldn't this be very close to the
traditional Linux interrupt model, where interrupts can interrupt each
other and we handle the most recent interrupt first?
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-31 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 152+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1099008264.4199.4.camel@krustophenia.net>
2004-10-29 0:57 ` [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4] Paul Davis
2004-10-29 2:10 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 8:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-29 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 11:01 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 11:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 11:26 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 11:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 13:35 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 13:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 14:03 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 14:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:32 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 16:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:16 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 17:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:33 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 17:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 18:36 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 20:51 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 21:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 1:06 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-30 11:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-26 17:16 ` [Jackit-devel] " Jack O'Quin
2004-10-29 20:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 21:31 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 21:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 21:42 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 21:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 21:53 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 23:12 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 11:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 17:49 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 19:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 19:43 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 19:47 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 19:57 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 19:52 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 20:15 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 20:26 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 21:13 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 21:26 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 21:38 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 23:12 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-31 12:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 12:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 12:54 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-31 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 13:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 15:20 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 15:59 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 19:06 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 13:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 14:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 15:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-01 17:55 ` Lee Revell
2004-11-01 17:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-01 18:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 18:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 22:30 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 22:40 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-01 22:51 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 22:59 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-02 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 15:06 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6.8 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 17:52 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 19:40 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 19:24 ` Norberto Bensa
2004-11-02 19:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 23:09 ` Karsten Wiese
2004-11-03 1:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 10:15 ` Karsten Wiese
2004-11-01 17:04 ` [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4] Rui Nuno Capela
2004-11-01 17:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-01 20:00 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-11-01 17:24 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 0:22 ` Michal Schmidt
2004-11-01 13:54 ` Paul Davis
2004-11-01 14:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 19:30 ` Paul Davis
2004-11-02 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 14:03 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 15:29 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 23:41 ` [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6] Remi Colinet
2004-11-03 1:04 ` Remi Colinet
2004-11-01 11:55 ` [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4] Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 12:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 12:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-01 12:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 13:40 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 13:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 16:47 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-10-31 23:16 ` Michal Schmidt
2004-11-01 0:05 ` Magnus Määttä
2004-10-31 13:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 14:11 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 13:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 14:28 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 13:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 21:58 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-10-31 22:11 ` K.R. Foley
2004-10-31 2:20 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-31 10:00 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 12:09 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2004-10-31 12:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 12:35 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-31 12:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 20:05 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 20:29 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 0:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 22:31 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 22:50 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 17:53 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 3:36 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 3:48 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 17:44 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 11:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 13:16 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 1:10 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 1:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 13:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 14:19 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 14:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 14:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 14:38 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 19:33 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 19:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-01 14:32 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-01 14:36 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-01 16:34 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-01 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1099224598.1459.28.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=annabellesgarden@yahoo.de \
--cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
--cc=doogie@debian.org \
--cc=jackit-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
--cc=nando@ccrma.stanford.edu \
--cc=paul@linuxaudiosystems.com \
--cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox