From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759065AbZEMIz2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 04:55:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757171AbZEMIzM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 04:55:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f176.google.com ([209.85.219.176]:35104 "EHLO mail-ew0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755859AbZEMIzJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 04:55:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=c51H3pw+qVd8FWhvBVZFRBLlcWVM8upgPdKRCRw/Kp9LcI54E/zn2ExQZxldBLEac6 bTAjbJCxllLTyQNdcrR8eTAw0JFquHWjaG3FLkPn1pN9D17KQld3XE2QI+Ms0MkI2yRi cCYNpr5K4mNQh4000QNTvlS/DaQ735RMvT1FE= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090513095127.308b00e7@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20090511222702.352192505@arndb.de> <200905112238.55404.arnd@arndb.de> <20090512090602.65722342@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <200905121123.21436.arnd@arndb.de> <20090513033027.GA13193@cynthia.pants.nu> <20090513043409.GA13577@cynthia.pants.nu> <20090513095127.308b00e7@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:55:09 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d59f689e76a99a53 Message-ID: <10f740e80905130155pd24c4e3n538be3110ac34b54@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: libata depends on HAS_DMA From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Alan Cox Cc: Brad Boyer , Michael Schmitz , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, takata@linux-m32r.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:51, Alan Cox wrote: >> > If it doesn't interfere with plain PIO mode, fine. >> >> I agree. There definitely needs to still be support for IDE ports that >> don't have DMA capability. > > There is - it's just if the platform doesn't implement the dma_* APIs you > get a problem. Note that there are other things missing on m68k and m32r, that's why Al added the | depends on !(M32R || M68K) || BROKEN commit 9317fd4c60962d3a9423b5f9bb5d1b10cf8a0699 Author: Al Viro Date: Sun Sep 24 23:40:00 2006 +0100 [PATCH] libata won't build on m68k and m32r no ioread*(), for one thing Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds