Re: CELF interest in suspend-to-flash

[Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>]

Hi.

On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 02:41, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:06:31AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 04:59, Tim Bird wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Lately, the CE Linux Forum power management working group is showing some
> > > interest in suspend-to-flash.  Is there any current work in this area?
> > > 
> > > Who should we talk to if we want to get involved with this (or lead
> > > an effort if there isn't one)?
> > 
> > Can flash be treated as a swap device at the moment? If so, it might
> > simply be a matter of specifying the same parameter used in swapon for
> > the resume2= boot parameter.
> 
> Sure, you only need to have the flash as a block device (ie driven 
> by the IDE code).

Cool. In that case, it should work fine with either swsusp (the mainline
implementation) or suspend2.

Regards,

Nigel
-- 
Nigel Cunningham
Pastoral Worker
Christian Reformed Church of Tuggeranong
PO Box 1004, Tuggeranong, ACT 2901

You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ
died for the ungodly.		-- Romans 5:6