From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: brking@us.ibm.com, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:45:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1100904309.3855.49.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041119213232.GB13259@kroah.com>
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 13:32 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 02:23:22PM -0600, brking@us.ibm.com wrote:
> > -static inline int pci_read_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 *val)
> > -{
> > - return pci_bus_read_config_byte (dev->bus, dev->devfn, where, val);
> > -}
>
> Well, as much as I despise this patch, you should at least get it
> correct :)
>
> You need to block the pci_bus_* functions too, otherwise the parts of
> the kernel that use them will stomp all over your device, right?
The real issue is how to do the BIST write in fact once locked ... An
option would be to have an "atomic" write BIST & lock device, which
would do the whole operation with the spinlock.
I agree with Greg, the blocking should be done in the bus functions in
drivers/pci/access.c, and the helper that does the BIST thing should use
the low level callback directly within the lock.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-19 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-19 20:23 [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST brking
2004-11-19 21:32 ` Greg KH
2004-11-19 22:25 ` Brian King
2004-11-19 22:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-19 23:22 ` Brian King
2004-11-20 0:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-19 22:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2004-11-20 2:27 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-20 7:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-20 12:42 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-20 22:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-20 23:38 ` Brian King
2004-11-21 0:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-21 1:55 ` Brian King
2004-11-21 7:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-21 17:22 ` Brian King
2004-12-03 15:26 ` Brian King
2004-11-24 11:49 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-25 22:00 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-11-25 21:11 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1100904309.3855.49.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox