Re: drivers/w1/: why is dscore.c not ds9490r.c ?

[Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1277 bytes --]

On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:33 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:31:12AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Hi Evgeniy,
> > 
> > Hello, Adrian.
> 
> Hi Evgeniy,
> 
> > > drivers/w1/Makefile in recent 2.6 kernels contains:
> > >   obj-$(CONFIG_W1_DS9490)         += ds9490r.o 
> > >   ds9490r-objs    := dscore.o
> > > 
> > > Is there a reason, why dscore.c isn't simply named ds9490r.c ?
> > 
> > dscore.c is a core function set to work with ds2490 chip.
> > ds9490* is built on top of it.
> > Any vendor can create it's own w1 bus master using this chip, 
> > not ds9490.
> 
> if it was built on top of it, I'd have expected ds9490r.o to contain 
> additional object files.

DS9490 does not have anything except this chip and simple 64bit memory
chip,
so it is not needed to have any additional code.

> How would a different w1 bus master chip look like in 
> drivers/w1/Makefile?

obj-m: proprietary_module.o
proprietary_module-objs: dscore.o proprietary_module_init.o

Actually it will live outside the kernel tree, but will require ds2490
driver.
It could be called ds2490.c but I think dscore is better name.

> > 	Evgeniy Polyakov
> 
> cu
> Adrian
> 
-- 

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]