From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drivers/w1/: why is dscore.c not ds9490r.c ?
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:05:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1101143109.9784.9.camel@uganda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041122165145.GH19419@stusta.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1935 bytes --]
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 17:51 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 07:25:45PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:33 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:31:12AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > Hi Evgeniy,
> > > >
> > > > Hello, Adrian.
> > >
> > > Hi Evgeniy,
> > >
> > > > > drivers/w1/Makefile in recent 2.6 kernels contains:
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_W1_DS9490) += ds9490r.o
> > > > > ds9490r-objs := dscore.o
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a reason, why dscore.c isn't simply named ds9490r.c ?
> > > >
> > > > dscore.c is a core function set to work with ds2490 chip.
> > > > ds9490* is built on top of it.
> > > > Any vendor can create it's own w1 bus master using this chip,
> > > > not ds9490.
> > >
> > > if it was built on top of it, I'd have expected ds9490r.o to contain
> > > additional object files.
> >
> > DS9490 does not have anything except this chip and simple 64bit memory
> > chip,
> > so it is not needed to have any additional code.
> >
> > > How would a different w1 bus master chip look like in
> > > drivers/w1/Makefile?
> >
> > obj-m: proprietary_module.o
> > proprietary_module-objs: dscore.o proprietary_module_init.o
> >
> > Actually it will live outside the kernel tree, but will require ds2490
> > driver.
> > It could be called ds2490.c but I think dscore is better name.
>
> Why are you talking about proprietary modules living outside the kernel
> tree?
>
> The only interesting case is the one of modules shipped with the kernel.
> And for them, this will break at link time if two such modules are
> included statically into the kernel.
If we _currently_ do not have any open hw/module that depends on ds2490
core then it does not
mean that tomorrow noone will add it.
> cu
> Adrian
>
--
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-22 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-21 22:02 drivers/w1/: why is dscore.c not ds9490r.c ? Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 7:31 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-22 13:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 16:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-22 16:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 17:05 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2004-11-22 17:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-22 17:37 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-23 0:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-23 10:34 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2004-11-25 15:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-29 1:52 ` [2.6 patch] drivers/w1/: possible cleanups Adrian Bunk
2004-11-29 5:12 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1101143109.9784.9.camel@uganda \
--to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox