From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kihontech.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.29-0, and 30-9
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:47:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1101246438.1594.3.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1101244924.32068.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 16:22 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Just curious to why you scale the interrupts from 49 down to 25. What
> would be wrong with keeping all of them at 49 (or whatever). Being a
> FIFO, no interrupt would preempt another. Why would you want the first
> IRQs to be registered have higher priority than (and thus will preempt)
> irqs registered later.
I raised this issue before. I agree that all interrupts should get the
same RT prio by default. Otherwise the default behavior is arbitrary.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-23 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-22 16:06 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.30-2 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-22 22:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-22 21:21 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-23 11:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-23 4:43 ` Adam Heath
2004-11-23 11:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-23 18:07 ` Adam Heath
2004-11-23 19:17 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.29-0, and 30-9 Adam Heath
2004-11-23 21:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2004-11-23 21:47 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2004-11-23 22:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2004-11-24 3:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-24 4:06 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.30-2 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-24 9:00 ` Adam Heath
2004-11-25 3:22 ` Adam Heath
2004-11-25 17:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-25 17:13 ` Adam Heath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1101246438.1594.3.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@kihontech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).