From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261369AbUKXAPh (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:15:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261391AbUKXAJw (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:09:52 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:5602 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261698AbUKXAHW (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:07:22 -0500 Subject: Re: bug in mm/slab.c From: Lee Revell To: Brent Casavant Cc: celeron2002@chile.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <34591.200.113.104.46.1101247993.squirrel@mail.chile.com> <1101250929.5207.1.camel@krustophenia.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:07:17 -0500 Message-Id: <1101254837.13549.3.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 18:02 -0600, Brent Casavant wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Lee Revell wrote: > > Did you see the line about 'module license NVIDIA taints kernel'? > > Google for what this means and you will understand why this bug report > > is offtopic. > > Not necessarily. OK, this one was real. But, my point remains valid re: tainted vs untainted kernels. Lee