From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261827AbULCAhZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:37:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261826AbULCAhZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:37:25 -0500 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:48300 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261827AbULCAhW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:37:22 -0500 Subject: Re: dma errors with sata_sil and Seagate disk From: Alan Cox To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <20041201115045.3ab20e03@homer.sarvega.com> <1101944482.30990.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <1102030431.7175.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 23:33:53 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Iau, 2004-12-02 at 10:01, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Is there some problem with Seagate drives in general? I'm using two > ST3160827AS drives on an SI3114 controller, and haven't seen any > glitches yet. That model is not in the blacklist, and performance is > what I'd usually expect. Is it pure luck that has kept me away from > problems? I've never been able to get a non NDA list of the affected drives. Got to love vendors some days