linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 32-bit syscalls from 64-bit process on x86-64?
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:16:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1102115789.8707.122.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041203061520.GG31767@wotan.suse.de>

On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 07:15 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> int 0x80 from 64bit will call 32bit syscalls.

Hm, that's not what I found.  If I run int 0x80 with [re]ax=1, I get
exit with a 32-bit process and write with a 64-bit one.

>  But some things
> will not work properly, e.g. signals because they test the 32bit
> flag in the task_struct. So you would still get 64bit signal frames.

OK, I can deal with that, since signals are never directly delivered to
the client.

> There are some other such tests, but they probably wont affect you.
> 
> There were some plans at one point to allow to toggle the flag 
> using personality or prctl, but so far it hasn't been implemented.
> There is also no way to do 64bit calls from a 32bit executable.

What about my idea of using distinct ranges of syscall numbers to
disambiguate them?

	J


  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-03 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-02 16:22 32-bit syscalls from 64-bit process on x86-64? Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-12-02 18:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-12-03  6:15 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-03 23:16   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2004-12-04 14:40     ` Petr Vandrovec
2004-12-04 21:33       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-12-08  2:30       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-12-14  7:45       ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-14 22:01 Petr Vandrovec
2004-12-15  4:27 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15 10:50   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-12-15 10:55     ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-15 20:58       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2004-12-16  4:35         ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1102115789.8707.122.camel@localhost \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).