From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261154AbULDUjH (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2004 15:39:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261155AbULDUjH (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2004 15:39:07 -0500 Received: from sp36.amenworld.com ([62.193.200.26]:59624 "EHLO tuxedo-es.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261154AbULDUjA (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2004 15:39:00 -0500 Subject: SELinux port for 2.4.28 (and incoming backport from 2.6) released. From: Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro Reply-To: lorenzo@gnu.org To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6J4wQB4+6SgNjy9Ob89j" Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 21:38:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1102192723.19001.19.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-6J4wQB4+6SgNjy9Ob89j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I was wondering for a backport of SELinux patch for the 2.4 brand, and i've observed that there's just a patch, deprecated, for 2.4.26. As the first move for trying to backport the current 2.6 patch capabilities i've ported the old 2.4.26 patch to 2.4.28, without huge problems and just fixing some errors with proc fs stuff and others. I've not tested it yet, but hopefully works. I want to know if someone is interested in doing this, as the main reasons are that 2.4 kernels are used by many people, possibly more than the ones using revisions from the 2.6 brand, and also that we can offer the possibility of using the SELinux enhancements without changing the kernel.In addition, if you compare 2.6 revisions changelogs with 2.4 ones you can see that many things change between releases, and not in 2.4 that are only security related and critical or major enhancements. The gzip'ed patch can be found at: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3D118309&package_id= =3D137453 Joshua was telling me that many things changed in the 2.6 releases, and that many things are deprecated or obsolete in the old 2.4.26 patch, so, i will appreciate any help for backporting them and giving support for those new capabilities. I'm CC'ing the LKML because this could be of interest for the kernel hackers, in an hypothetical case of including a backported and updated version of SELinux patch in the 2.4 brand. Cheers and enjoy, PS: I'm not an experienced developer in C terms, i just do what i can do and often i get obsessed when i can't get something done, so, i think that equilibrates the balance of knowledge<->attitudes (it's not easy to fit all of this in time when you're just fifteen years old, but i can't excuse unexpected kernel panics :) ). =20 --=20 Lorenzo Hern=E1ndez Garc=EDa-Hierro [1024D/6F2B2DEC] Hardened Debian head developer & project manager. http://www.debian-hardened.org=20 --=-6J4wQB4+6SgNjy9Ob89j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBsiBTDcEopW8rLewRAr1dAKCKWqroKehwlmhVmsn8tvTe/rjAjwCeLvHX dFohCvkKK6BQvBbV8OCmf0k= =cHDw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6J4wQB4+6SgNjy9Ob89j--