From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261558AbULFQlF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:41:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261560AbULFQlF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:41:05 -0500 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([130.57.169.10]:30866 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261558AbULFQlD (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:41:03 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2 From: Robert Love To: Kyle Moffett Cc: Jeff Sipek , Linux Kernel , Jens Axboe , Con Kolivas In-Reply-To: <62852042-4781-11D9-9115-000393ACC76E@mac.com> References: <20041204104921.GC10449@suse.de> <20041204163948.GA20486@optonline.net> <20041205185844.GF6430@suse.de> <20041206002954.GA28205@optonline.net> <41B3BD0F.6010008@kolivas.org> <20041206022338.GA5472@optonline.net> <41B3C54B.1080803@kolivas.org> <1102310049.6052.123.camel@localhost> <62852042-4781-11D9-9115-000393ACC76E@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:42:18 -0500 Message-Id: <1102351338.6052.126.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The reason I proposed my ideas for tying the two values together is > that I am > concerned about breaking existing code. Nothing should break. If apps don't explicitly set their i/o priority, then they get the default. Not a big deal. This allows the default case to be the same as today. Robert Love